Free Case Review Text us

Trial Pro P.A. is proud to advocate for accident victims all over the state of Florida, including from our Central Florida office in Orlando. Our dedicated experienced personal injury attorneys handle a range of legal matters, from employment disputes to auto accidents claims. We can use our knowledge and legal skills to help you not only achieve a favorable outcome but relieve the legal burden on your shoulders as well. Our entire team understands how challenging and confusing litigation can be, which is why we are here for you through every step of the process.

The Trial Pro, P.A. attorneys, carry more than a century of collective legal experience and decades of working together as a team. We have represented hundreds if not thousands of people who have been injured due to car accidents, slip-and-fall, worker's compensation cases, and more. One thing that is clear to us is the essence of partnership. Without it, Trial Pro, P.A. could not be as effective in attaining success for our clients.

What is Comparative Negligence?

Frequently Asked Questions - What is Comparative Negligence?

What is Comparative Negligence?

The legal definition of negligence is Florida is “the failure to use reasonable care, which is the care that a reasonably careful person would use under like circumstances. Negligence is doing something that a reasonably careful person would not do under like circumstances or failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances”.  In other words, a person’s conduct is evaluated by comparing said person’s actions to the actions of a person engaging in the same activity who is performing said activity in a careful manner.   In addition, a person can be negligent by failing to take action he or she should have taken. 

The determination of negligence does not begin and end with identifying a negligent party.  Under Florida Law, the doctrine of comparative negligence is the legal standard.  Comparative negligence is the determination of how negligent a person or multiple people acted in the course of a crash.  For instance, in our rear end collision example, the rear driver is presumed to be 100% negligent.  But what happens in a situation where a driver passes through a red light, but the other driver recognizes this and has an opportunity to take evasive action and either avoid the crash all together or lessen the impact through defensive actions?  A jury considering that type of scenario would be required to determine if both drivers shared responsibility, and if so the jury would be required to apportion a specific percentage of negligence to each party.  In this example, a jury may find the driver who passed through the red light to be 90% negligent and they may simultaneously find the driver with the right of way to be 10% negligent for failing to take reasonable actions to either avoid the crash all together or lessen the impact.  This analysis would use the portion of the negligence definition above that discusses negligence in terms of failing to act in a reasonable manner. 

In some states other than Florida, states apply the doctrine of contributory negligence instead of comparative negligence.  In a contributory negligence jurisdiction, if any party is 1% negligent, that party cannot maintain a lawsuit against any other negligent parties.  As you can imagine, following this doctrine can lead to highly unfair results.  That is why states like Florida have steered away from contributory negligence and instead followed comparative negligence, so that any involved driver will be responsible only for the injurie or damages caused by his or her proportional negligence.

Because comparative negligence is based on fairness of any party being responsible only for the damages that particular party caused, comparative negligence applies to all personal injury actions including automobile crashes, slip and fall injuries, medical malpractice, products liability, etc.  In each of these cases, any potential negligent party will pay only for the damages it caused.  A recent trial provides an excellent illustration of how comparative negligence works when there are multiple negligent parties.  The case involved a motor vehicle crash that resulted in the death of 3 young adults.  The vehicle was traveling on a four lane highway in Central Florida moving at approximately 65 miles per hour.  Suddenly and without warning, one of the vehicle’s tires exploded causing the vehicle to careen out of control into the opposite travel lane, eventually crashing head on with an SUV.  All 3 occupants of the sedan died on impact.  An inspection of the blown tire revealed a manufacturing defect in the steel belt which allowed the structure of the tire to weaken once the tire reached a certain temperature.  The negligence of the tire manufacturer caused the vehicle to suddenly veer to the left.  According to accident reconstruction experts who were able to recreate the movement of the vehicle and all the dynamics of the crash, though the tire manufacturer was clearly negligent, the driver overcorrected after the tire blew out.  In other words, the driver could have either mitigated the severity of the crash or possible avoided the crash had she did not immediately lock up the brakes.  In addition, the investigation revealed the driver of the SUV traveling in the opposite direction had consumed 4 glasses of wine three hours prior to the crash, and the consumption of alcohol likely delayed his reaction time by an additional second. Interestingly, the SUV driver was only 17 years old, and his legal guardian knew he had consumed alcohol, and though they did not give him the keys to the vehicle, they did not forbid him to drive their vehicle.  The jury was instructed to consider the respective responsibility, or comparative negligence of the tire manufacturer, the deceased driver of the sedan, the driver of the SUV traveling in the opposite direction, and the SUV driver’s legal guardian who did not prevent the seventeen year old driver from operating their vehicle that evening.  .  They found the deceased driver of the sedan 30% negligent, the tire manufacturer 45% negligent, the driver of the SUV to be 15% negligent, and the legal guardian’s negligence was 10%.  There is no formula for determining these degrees of comparative fault.  This determination is solely in the province of the jury based on the evidence in any particular case.  The total damages were 2.8 million dollars, and each negligent party’s comparative negligence was applied to each party to determine their respective amounts. 

Finally, though the comparative negligence doctrine is based on fairness, there are situations when application of the doctrine can be less than fair to an injured party.  In some situations with multiple negligent parties, one or more party may be insolvent or uncollectable.  It’s one thing to obtain a verdict from a jury; however the verdict must be collected from the defendant.  In a recent trial, there were two negligent parties who were both defendants in the case.  The jury found each defendant 50% at fault and awarded $400,000 in damages.  Unfortunately, one of the defendants allowed his insurance policy to lapse, and he had no assets to satisfy the judgment.  After applying comparative negligence, the injured party was only able to collect half his damages.  Though such a result is possible, comparative negligence remains the most equitable manner to determine damages in personal injury cases.



Watch Video


Discover the TRIAL PRO Difference!

Call Now (407) 300-0000

Free Case Review

We are dedicated to fully serving you to every degree. We vow to make the entire process of working with us as easy and as stress-free as possible. Therefore, we are more than happy to meet with you at your home, place of employment, hospital room, or other location that you find more convenient. You are always welcome to come into our office as well. Contact us Today!

Free Case Review Text us

Car Accident Attorneys

With more than a century of collective legal experience and a commitment to hard work, excellence, and integrity, we have recovered millions of dollars in damages on behalf of our clients.
Our goal is to enable our clients to sit back and focus on their recovery, knowing that the team at Trial Pro, P.A. has the experience and resources to effectively handle all of the legal details involved in their case.

Personal Injury Law

We put our knowledge and legal abilities into action to assist you to attain a positive outcome and ease the legal stress from your shoulders simultaneously. Trial Pro, P.A., holds a reputation for achieving real success for clients. Please leave it to us to fight wisely but aggressively.

Car Accident Attorneys

Experiencing a car accident can be frustrating and scary, but our promises to you are fully authentic. Trial Pro, P.A.'s injury attorneys, do not under-deliver. Instead, we do everything in our capabilities to go above and beyond your expectations.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Our objective is to enable our clients to relax and concentrate on healing, recognizing that the legal professionals at Trial Pro, P.A. holds the knowledge and resources to adequately tackle all the legal and financial specifics associated with their dispute.

What Our Clients Say

What Our Clients Say About Our Personal Injury Attorneys

"From the beginning we knew we were in good hands."
Clarence,
Personal Injury Case
Trial Pro got me $491,000
"I wouldn't be where I am today without Trial Pro."
Clarence,
Personal Injury Case
Trial Pro got me $998,000
"Trial Pro satisfied client 2021"
Client,
Car Accident Case
Trial Pro got me $1,900,000
"We are really glad that we choose you guys to represent us."
Nicole,
Personal Injury Case
Trial Pro got me $1,000,000
"Trial Pro makes sure you get what you deserve."
Ashley,
Personal Injury Case
Trial Pro got me $795,000
"Trial Pro satisfied client 2021"
Client,
Car Accident Case
Trial Pro got me $1,510,000
"When I hired Trial Pro, I didn't have to worry about anything."
Mark,
Motorcycle Accident Case
Trial Pro got me $810,000

Our Personal Injury attorneys have been featured in numerous publications

Call Now (407) 300-0000

Personal Injury Attorneys

Committed to Your Personal & Financial Recovery


Our goal is to make the process as easy as possible for you. You don't even have to come into our office if you cannot travel or adjust your schedule to make it to us. We're more than happy to come to you!

In addition to traveling directly to our clients, the team at Trial Pro, P.A. also pledges to provide clear advice and regular client communication. We know how vital regular contact with our clients is - we never leave you hanging or delay our responses. 

Mobirise

Orlando Personal Injury Attorneys

After experiencing an automobile accident, the last thing you desire is to have an attorney at hand that doesn’t know how to represent you adequately. You want a reputable law firm that will.

Serious Representation
We put our knowledge and legal abilities into action to assist you to attain a positive outcome and ease the legal stress from your shoulders simultaneously. Trial Pro, P.A., holds a reputation for achieving real success for clients. Please leave it to us to fight wisely but aggressively. 
Unmatched Case Results
Experiencing a car accident can be frustrating and scary, but our promises to you are fully authentic. Trial Pro, P.A.'s injury legal attorneys, do not under-deliver. Instead, we do everything in our capabilities to go above and beyond your expectations. 
Committed to Our Clients
It would help if you didn't have to beg for a call back from your attorney. It would be best if you didn't have to beg for an update on your case. At Trial Pro, P.A., we don't operate in that manner. We constantly call our clients to give them updates on their claims. If we miss a call, we promise always to return it.
Compassionate In & Out of Court
Our objective is to enable our clients to relax and concentrate on healing, recognizing that the legal professionals at Trial Pro, P.A. holds the knowledge and resources to adequately tackle all the legal and financial specifics associated with their dispute.

Pursuing Client Victories

Based in Florida, Trial Pro, P.A. represents clients across Florida from our offices in Miami, Orlando, Ft. Myers, Naples, Delray Beach, Jacksonville, and Daytona Beach. We are dedicated to fully serving you to every degree. We vow to make the entire process of working with us as easy and as stress-free as possible. Therefore, we are more than happy to meet with you at your home, place of employment, hospital room, or other business that you find more convenient. You are always welcome to come into our office as well.

Free Case Review Text us

 Send Message
* The following info is required

 Our Locations

Trial Pro P.A. is proud to advocate for accident victims all over the state of Florida. Our dedicated, experienced personal injury attorneys handle various legal matters, from employment disputes to auto accidents claims. We can use our knowledge and legal skills to help you not only achieve a favorable outcome but relieve the legal burden on your shoulders as well. Our entire team understands how challenging and confusing litigation can be, which is why we are here for you through every step of the process.


Trial Pro P.A. Orlando Office

  (407) 300-0000

 250 N Orange Ave 14th Floor
Orlando, FL 32801


Trial Pro P.A. Tampa Office

  (813) 522-5444

 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 512
Tampa, FL, 33602


Trial Pro P.A. Naples Office

  (239) 300-0000

 1019 Crosspointe Dr Suite 1
Naples, FL 34110


Trial Pro P.A. Fort Myers Office

  (239) 400-5000

 9341 Marketplace Rd
Fort Myers, FL 33912


Trial Pro P.A. Melbourne Office

  (321) 586-2088

 2551 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite 102
Melbourne, FL, 32935

Contact Info

250 N Orange Ave, 14th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

help@trialpro.com

(407) 300-0000


Our law firm fights aggressively -- always determined to win your case. 

Trial Pro, P.A. Car Accident Attorneys

Trial Pro, P.A.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. The Information presented at this site should not be construed as formal legal advice nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. For medical advice and treatment, you should contact a licensed medical professional.