Free Case Review Text us

Trial Pro P.A. is proud to advocate for accident victims all over the state of Florida, including from our Central Florida office in Orlando. Our dedicated experienced personal injury attorneys handle a range of legal matters, from employment disputes to auto accidents claims. We can use our knowledge and legal skills to help you not only achieve a favorable outcome but relieve the legal burden on your shoulders as well. Our entire team understands how challenging and confusing litigation can be, which is why we are here for you through every step of the process.

The Trial Pro, P.A. attorneys, carry more than a century of collective legal experience and decades of working together as a team. We have represented hundreds if not thousands of people who have been injured due to car accidents, slip-and-fall, worker's compensation cases, and more. One thing that is clear to us is the essence of partnership. Without it, Trial Pro, P.A. could not be as effective in attaining success for our clients.

What Does The Law Say About Transitory Foreign Substances?

Frequently Asked Questions - What Does The Law Say About Transitory Foreign Substances?

Florida Statute 768.0755 discusses premises liability for transitory foreign substances in a business establishment.  This tort law regarding negligence applies to every personal injury case where someone slips on a substance and falls in a Florida business establishment.  The statute reads that if a person slips and falls on a transitory foreign substance and was injured, that individual must prove that the business establishment had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazardous condition and should have taken action and remedied it.  The statute defines a transitory foreign substance as any liquid or solid substance, item or object located where it does not belong.  A transitory foreign substance can be a plethora of items.  A few examples are: water, oil, grease, food, clothing, and many more items. 

The definition of transitory foreign substances arose from legal precedent in a slip and fall case.  It was found in a footnote in a premise liability Supreme Court case against Publix Supermarkets where a woman slipped and fell on a banana.  In this particular case, the court decided in 2001 and passed a bill in 2002 that the burden of proof was on that of the property owner and its operators to demonstrate that they had used reasonable care in maintaining their premises.  However, in the opinion, the court held that the sheer existence of the transient foreign substance on the floor created a presumption that the premises was in fact not maintained in a reasonably safe condition. 

Since the case of Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., Florida Statute with respect to transient foreign substances has drastically changed and evolved.  The burden of proof has completely shifted from the defendant to the plaintiff

Florida Statute 768.0710 stated that the burden of proof was now on the plaintiff.  The plaintiff was required to prove that the business establishment/ property owner acted negligently by failing to exercise reasonable care on their premises which, in turn, caused injury.  The statute then explained that actual or constructive notice of the transitory foreign substance was not a required element of proof to the claim.  But in 2010, Florida legislature commenced its most recent revision of this policy by passing a bill to repeal the former 2002 Florida Statute 768.0710, and enact a new statute in its place, Section 768.0755

Now, the current Florida Statute 768.0755 regarding transitory foreign substances places an even greater burden on the plaintiff.  The plaintiff is now required to prove that the business establishment had either actual or constructive knowledge of the hazardous condition.  Actual knowledge and constructive knowledge are important legal concepts often used in tort law.  These differing types of knowledge have an extensive effect when determining liability.  Actual knowledge is just as it sounds – when someone or the business establishment actually knows something.  Actual knowledge is used to directly and clearly prove liability as the guilty party would have the relevant information in question and there is no uncertainty in the matter.  Constructive knowledge, on the other hand, references knowledge that a party is presumed to have regardless of whether actually they do or not.  A business establishment would be considered to have constructive knowledge if the knowledge is something that they could reasonably be expected to know.  It is attributed by law to a given party as knowledge that would be attainable through the exercise of reasonable care.  Plainly stated, constructive knowledge is when someone is legally presumed to know something because they should have known it.  A court may often find that a person has constructive knowledge of a certain condition, even if they lacked actual knowledge.  In order to prove such, the plaintiff or their attorney, would have to present circumstantial evidence showing that the dangerous condition was present for such a lengthy amount of time that if the defendant was practicing reasonable care of its establishment, then they could have known about the hazard which caused the plaintiff’s injuries.  Circumstantial evidence can also be presented which reveals that the dangerous condition in question occurred regularly and was therefore foreseeable by the defendant, and they simply took no proactive steps to rectify that foreseeable hazard. 

Circumstantial evidence is the compilation of facts which point to negligence as the logical conclusion rather than demonstrating it outright with direct evidence.  Simply put, circumstantial evidence implies a fact based on other relevant information.  We are able to provide such evidence to establish liability through the evidentiary rule of Res Ipsa Loquitur.  Quite often in premise liability claims, direct evidence of negligence does not exist.  Therefore, this legal concept permits the plaintiff to establish a presumption of negligence against the defendant through the use of circumstantial evidence.  In most states, there are three requirements that a plaintiff, or in most instances, their attorney, must first meet prior to a jury being allowed to make the inference that the defendant is negligent.  Those requirements are as follows: the incident would not normally occur unless someone acted negligently; the evidence confirms that neither the plaintiff nor a third party caused the injury or contributed to the injury; and the negligence in question falls within the scope of the defendant’s duty to the plaintiff.  Additionally, in order for Res Ipsa Loquitur to apply, there must be no contribution by that of the plaintiff, meaning this incident occurred to no fault of your own.  This doctrine also necessitates that the defendant has exclusive control and responsibility over the instrumentality or agent that caused the plaintiff’s injuries.  

Tort law is ever changing with the times.  If you have recently been victim to a slip and fall accident, you should seek the legal advice of an experienced personal injury attorney right away.  Being very familiar with all applicable Florida Statutes regarding premises liability, a personal injury attorney has the appropriate knowledge to easily navigate, present, and argue your claim.  Since the burden of proof now lies upon the plaintiff, having a qualified and skilled lawyer that specializes in that aspect of law is indispensable and can be the difference between losing and winning your case.

Free Case Review Text us
Personal Injury Attorneys
Committed to Your Personal & Financial Recovery

Our goal is to make the process as easy as possible for you. You don't even have to come into our office if you cannot travel or adjust your schedule to make it to us. We're more than happy to come to you!

In addition to traveling directly to our clients, the team at Trial Pro, P.A. also pledges to provide clear advice and regular client communication. We know how vital regular contact with our clients is - we never leave you hanging or delay our responses. 

Orlando Personal Injury Attorneys
After experiencing an automobile accident, the last thing you desire is to have an attorney at hand that doesn’t know how to represent you adequately. You want a reputable law firm that will.
Personal Injury Attorneys
Serious Representation
We put our knowledge and legal abilities into action to assist you to attain a positive outcome and ease the legal stress from your shoulders simultaneously. Trial Pro, P.A., holds a reputation for achieving real success for clients. Please leave it to us to fight wisely but aggressively. 
Personal Injury Lawyer
Unmatched Case Results
Experiencing a car accident can be frustrating and scary, but our promises to you are fully authentic. Trial Pro, P.A.'s injury legal attorneys, do not under-deliver. Instead, we do everything in our capabilities to go above and beyond your expectations. 
Car Accident Lawyers
Committed to Our Clients
It would help if you didn't have to beg for a call back from your attorney. It would be best if you didn't have to beg for an update on your case. At Trial Pro, P.A., we don't operate in that manner. We constantly call our clients to give them updates on their claims. If we miss a call, we promise always to return it.
Orlando Car Accident Lawyer
Compassionate In & Out of Court
Our objective is to enable our clients to relax and concentrate on healing, recognizing that the legal professionals at Trial Pro, P.A. holds the knowledge and resources to adequately tackle all the legal and financial specifics associated with their dispute.
Pursuing Client Victories

Based in Florida, Trial Pro, P.A. represents clients across Florida from our offices in Miami, Orlando, Ft. Myers, Naples, Delray Beach, Jacksonville, and Daytona Beach. We are dedicated to fully serving you to every degree. We vow to make the entire process of working with us as easy and as stress-free as possible. Therefore, we are more than happy to meet with you at your home, place of employment, hospital room, or other business that you find more convenient. You are always welcome to come into our office as well.

Free Case Review Text us

 Send Message
* The following info is required
 Our Locations
Trial Pro P.A. is proud to advocate for accident victims all over the state of Florida. Our dedicated, experienced personal injury attorneys handle various legal matters, from employment disputes to auto accidents claims. We can use our knowledge and legal skills to help you not only achieve a favorable outcome but relieve the legal burden on your shoulders as well. Our entire team understands how challenging and confusing litigation can be, which is why we are here for you through every step of the process.

Trial Pro P.A. Orlando Office

  (407) 300-0000

 250 N Orange Ave 14th Floor
Orlando, FL 32801

Trial Pro P.A. Tampa Office

  (813) 522-5444

 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 512
Tampa, FL, 33602

Trial Pro P.A. Naples Office

  (239) 300-0000

 870 111th Ave N #1
Naples, FL 34108

Trial Pro P.A. Fort Myers Office

  (239) 400-5000

 9341 Marketplace Rd
Fort Myers, FL 33912

Trial Pro P.A. Melbourne Office

  (321) 586-2088

 2551 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite 102
Melbourne, FL, 32935

Contact Info
250 N Orange Ave, 14th Floor
Orlando, FL 32801
(407) 300-0000

Our law firm fights aggressively -- always determined to win your case. 

Trial Pro, P.A. Car Accident Attorneys
Trial Pro, P.A.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. The Information presented at this site should not be construed as formal legal advice nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. For medical advice and treatment, you should contact a licensed medical professional.